(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.02 2016고단1184

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.02 2016고단1184

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2016, at around 20:30, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the Sanam-gu Sasan-gu Sasan-gu Sasan-si 3-lane 1, the Defendant: (b) saw the victim’s face face from the victim D (54 aged) who met with the victim who was the spokele in the village of this species C; (c) 2 times as a drinking event; and (d) once once the spores, the Defendant spokeed the front part of the eye on the right side where the victim’s treatment number cannot be known.

2. On June 30, 2016, the Defendant driven a bicycle with a motor device, the registration of which was cancelled at approximately 30 meters from the 11st day of the 11st day of the Yansan-gu, Yannam-gu, Yannam-gu to the front day of the 2nd road of the same Pungnam-gu, Yannam-gu, Seoul, without a bicycle bicycle driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Three-time trial records;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion on the details of the revocation of the driver's license is that it is true that the defendant's defense counsel assaulted the victim about the victim's injury to the victim D, and that the situation was not to the extent of hindering daily life and can be generally recovered depending on the passage of time, so it cannot be viewed as an injury.

However, in full view of the victim’s statement protocol, photograph, police investigation report (Evidence No. 46 pages) etc., it is recognized that the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, was unable to receive treatment because the victim was unable to receive treatment because it was not easy for the victim to receive treatment or diagnosis as a permanent citizen because the victim did not have money. In the process of dispute between the victim and C, the Defendant was faced with the victim’s face at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was faced with the victim’s right eye, and the victim was faced with the victim’s eye, and the victim was deprived of the victim’s right eye, and the police who investigated the instant case was exempted from flab, and the victim was also forced the victim to submit the diagnosis report.

2.2

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2018.10.17 2018고단1033

-전주지방법원 2014.01.14 2013고단2152

-전주지방법원 2015.08.19 2014고단1837

-전주지방법원 2018.07.17 2018고단532

-전주지방법원 2016.01.12 2015고정939