(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.11 2015고정496

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.11 2015고정496

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

On February 14:55, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as, during the Gyeyang-gu period, the Defendant: (b) on the front of the parking route of the Defendant, the Defendant: (c) obstructed the parking of the Defendant who was a public official D and the personnel E of the parking control company in the Gu Office C, for the purpose of parking regulation; (d) obstructed the parking system; and (e) assaulted the Defendant, such as, on the ground that parking regulation, the Defendant’s feet was conducted; and (e) the Defendant’s feet was 2-3 feet and one time feet.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public official D's parking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has no record of being subject to criminal punishment, the motive or circumstance of the crime can be taken into account, the submission of a written application seeking the preference of the head of the team in charge of parking control after the issuance of the summary order, the defendant asserted the legitimacy of the act and presented his/her position of denying the liability for the crime in the prosecutor’s office, and the defendant expressed his/her position that he/she would not interfere with the same mistake by recognizing the criminal act in this Court, the punishment shall be determined, such as reduction of KRW 1

참조조문

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2019.05.02 2018고합170

-부산지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단4217

-서울동부지방법원 2019.11.15 2019고단3086

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.24 2014고단7860

-서울남부지방법원 2021.03.19 2020고단5963