Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months and fines for 5,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 6 months and Defendant C’s fine for 3,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operated a commercial sex dealing business establishment with 20 rooms equipped with 20 rooms, etc. on the first floor of Gangnam-gu F-gu Seoul, Seoul, the said business was advertised on the Internet “H” website, and employment I et al. as female employees.

Defendant

B, Defendant C, as an employee of the above business place, was in charge of responding to customers and guiding them.

On August 28, 2014, the Defendants conspired to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes from July 2014 to August 28, 2014, by providing 130,000 won from the J to 13 out of the said business establishment, and providing guidance to female employees I in his/her hands.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police officer regarding I;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor and a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

B. Defendant B: Imprisonment option

C. Defendant C; Selection of fine;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A and B);

1. Probation and community service order (defendant A and B) The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment] 2 types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 years or older, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic, [the intermediation, etc. of sexual traffic by the receipt and payment of business costs] [the decision of a special sentencing] / Defendant A and C did not have the same criminal record. Defendant B did not have the same criminal record. Defendant B had the record of being punished once a fine due to the same kind of crime. The size of the business establishment in this case, the period of business, the degree of participation, and the motive for committing the crime