Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine for 7 million won, and by a fine for 1.5 million won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A had operated the business of "Gmast" on the third floor of the F hotel in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and had employed female employees H et al. to conduct the business of arranging sexual traffic against unspecified male descendants.

Defendant

B and Defendant C are the employees of the above business establishment who have been in charge of the contact and guidance of customers.

Defendants conspired to commit the same year from April 24, 2014

5. Until May 8, 2014 (However, from May 8, 2014, from May 6, 2014 to May 6, 2014, Defendant C engaged in acts of arranging sexual intercourse, such as arranging sexual traffic, by having a female employee H, etc. do a similar behavior by having his/her male knife with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of H concerning H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and advertisements;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor and a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic) concurrently, Defendant B and C: Selection of each fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Defendant A who suspended the execution of sentence: The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment: Defendant A] is that it is difficult to readily punish Defendants in consideration of the size of the crime in this case, method of the crime, profits from the crime, etc.

However, the defendants recognized the defendants' mistake and reflect it, the defendant A and C did not have the same criminal record, the defendant B was the first criminal without any criminal record, the defendant C and B merely an employee, and other defendants.