As to the crimes of "2017 Highest 933 Highest 181 Highest 2017 Highest 181" in the judgment of the defendant, six months shall be punished by imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months in imprisonment for fraud in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon support.

4. 11. The decision became final and conclusive.

Around October 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around October 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim E, who worked in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., was granted a loan in order to prepare for the business at the time, at the time, at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.’s operation of the Defendant located in the Gu-U.S. Si, Si, and that “A payment shall be made only KRW 30 million if the money entered after his own name.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable for 200 million won, and even if the Defendant did not borrow money from the injured party due to the lack of intended income, there was no intention or ability to pay the money normally.

Around October 30, 2013, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 30 million to the bank account in the name of the Defendant to the victim.

"2017 Highest 1811"

1. On November 1, 2013, the Defendant, who is in the Gu-U.S. Si, shall not pay the victim F with the money to the victim D office operated by the Defendant in the Gu-U.S., Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd.

The Republic of Korea shall pay as soon as possible.

B. A loan of KRW 20 million to B, and a loan of KRW 18 million, excluding interest, shall be made only one week after the transfer to the creditor by the creditor.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant's debt amounting to KRW 200,000,000 to KRW 30,000,000,000 is not repaid by the employees H of the Dispute Resolution D around October 20, 2013, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt normally even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the lack of expected income.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above and forcing the victim to make a subrogated repayment of KRW 18 million to the account in the name of G used by G, the creditor of the Defendant, around November 6, 2013, by means of remitting the amount of KRW 18 million to the account in the name of the victim.