beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
The evidence seized shall be confiscated from the accused.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On October 2, 2014, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and four months in the Busan District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 24, 2015.
Defendant
C brought the victim L to gambling, and Defendant A, D, and F intended to obtain money from the victim by means of fraud, by sharing each role in gambling and distributing attention to prevent the victim from being aware of fraud, while gambling together with gambling. The Defendant A, D, and F intended to obtain money from the victim by means of fraud, such as “Sick” (a technology in which the card is mixed with a card and dividing the card favorable to himself/herself or his/her own convenience) or “public bath” (a technology shifted with a card mixed with one’s own body or with one’s own convenience).
1. Defendant A, B, C, and D’s crimes committed on October 30, 2014 through 21:00, at the office of Defendant D located on the second floor of the 2nd floor of the Busan city M of the Busan city from around 17:0 to around 21:00, the Defendant C brought the victim L and gambling. The Defendants, along with the victim, carried the 52 card using the card, carried the 2,000 to 5,000 won with the 52 card and carried the hambing “hulh” box. Defendant A, C, and D used the “Sulhulh” technology, thereby deceiving the victim, and Defendant B took the hulf from the victim by spreading the hulbs so that the victim could not have known the hulbling technology.
2. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E’s criminal acts from around 16:00 to around 18:00 on October 31, 2014, and Defendant C brought the victim with her gambling and gambling. Defendant A, B, D, and E, together with the victim, her 52 card with the victim, walked the 3,000 to KRW 10,000 to KRW 10,000 with the 52 card, and her gambling. Defendant A and D used the her “Shul” technology, thereby deceiving the victim, and Defendant B and E are identified the her fraud gambling technology.