logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2015.04.29 2014누5492
해임 및 징계부과금 4배 처분 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is the amount calculated by multiplying 16,789,036 won by the amount of bribe received by the plaintiff from G pursuant to Article 2 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Rule of the Decree on Punishment of Public Officials, which provides that "one month" of Part 3, 14 of the Reasons for the Judgment of the court of first instance shall be "one month", and "the content of one week of the same face" of Article 2 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Officials Disciplinary Decree.

Ro, on the 4th page “E” in the 3th page, and “E” in the 15th page of the same section.

“A sentence was rendered,” and the prosecutor appealed to the same court 2014No542, but the above court rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s appeal on October 30, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2014.

Article 78 (1) 1 and 2 of the State Public Officials Act, Article 78 (1) 1 and 2 of the State Public Officials Act, Article 78 (1) of the State Public Officials Act, Article 78 (1) 1 and 2 of the same Act, Article 61 of the State Public Officials Act, Article 61 of the State Public Officials Act, shall be added to "16 of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials," and Article 66 of the State Public Officials Act, "19, 20 of the same Act," Article 20 of the same Act, "19, 20 of the same Act," Article 20 of the same Act, "19, 20 of the same Act," and Article 56 of the State Public Officials Act, "12 of the same Act," shall be deleted from "13 times," Article 8 of the State Public Officials Act, and Article 58 (2) of the same Act, "3 of the same Act," and Article 58 (2) of the State Public Officials Act," shall be deleted.

up to “A”.

The plaintiff's above act in Part 9 and No. 7 of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials was later violated the duty of prohibition of borrowing money under Article 16 (1) of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials, and the duty of good faith under Article 56 of the State Public Officials Act.

arrow