logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고합66
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 8, 2016, around 04:00, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim C (V) who is an employee of the said main shop in Seopopoposi, “E” located in D; (b) sought to leave from the vehicle; and (c) made the victim her “an altered year, getting off from the vehicle”; (d) walked the victim’s clothes; and (e) let the victim get off from the vehicle by cutting down the body of the victim’s hand; and (e) caused the victim’s injury to the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.”

2. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant who interfered with the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against the Victim F (Retaliatory Violence) and the Defendant was requested by an investigative agency to attend for the investigation of the instant case as described in paragraph (1). On November 30, 2016, around 01:00, the Victim F (53 tax) who is the operator of the “E” entertainment entertainment station as stated in paragraph (1) reported to the police with the intention to complete the payment of the entrance, while finding the above main points as a door to the Defendant, the Defendant filed a complaint against the Defendant;

In order to prevent the business, it threatens that the female employees would be A, D.," and the wall of the entrance of the calculating team and the main store into the hand floor on several occasions, spits or spits theme through several times on the face and head of the victim, and spits or spits the location of the customer who found the location, it is impossible to sprink or conduct sprink, and the width is changed.

“ Sheeted the path by probing the Si expenses.”

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation or witness's statement in relation to the investigation of his criminal case, and interfered with the main operation of the victim by force over about 30 minutes.

3. The Defendant, at around December 23:56, 2016, ordered the victim’s tobacco at the convenience store in the operation of the Victim G (M, 41 years old) located in Seopopopopo City H on December 6, 2016, and ordered the victim’s tobacco to “Aradem” from the damaged party A.

arrow