Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, C, and D, with C’s friendship introduction around December 2012, around 1st, 2012, performed a test of the Victim F of the First Instance E in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, and H’s joint operation by G, but did not receive part of the construction cost.

Defendants, C, and D receive construction cost around 19:00 on January 5, 2013, and they drink alcohol at the above “H” house.

On January 5, 2013, in collusion with C and D, the Defendants called the victim G who requested construction under the influence of alcohol in the above heading house, and Defendant B interfered with the victim’s business by force of customers, including road users, who had been under the influence of drinking and drinking in the vehicle outside of the sound called “Yei Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, fch fch son Ha son Ha son Ha son Ha son Ha son Ha son Ha Ha son Ha Ha son Ha Ha son Ha Ha Ha Ha son Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against Defendants, C, and D

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of F and C;

1. Investigation reports (Submission of evidentiary data from the victim's motion picture USSB), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (examination of data from the USB);

1. Articles 314(1) and 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for criminal facts

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act