1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Korea Urban Development Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Urban Development Corporation”) and (1) a subcontract agreement on July 14, 2009 with respect to the construction work of the metal and windows at KRW 3,080,000 for the said construction work (after this, the construction cost on July 20, 2010 has been changed to KRW 3,184,50,000,000), ② the subcontract agreement on April 19, 2010 for the construction work of KRW 14,83,000 for the said construction work of KRW 14,83,00,000 for the said construction work of KRW 0,00 for the said construction work of KRW 20,00,000 for the said construction work of KRW 20,00 for the said construction work of KRW 80,00 for the said construction work of KRW 10,803,000 for the construction work of KRW 10,000 for the said construction work of KRW 104,5,01060.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction” by aggregating each construction subcontracted by the Korea Urban Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Urban Development Corporation”). (b)

The Plaintiff, a corporation, the purpose of which is to produce Changho, supplied 26 workers, including B, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “instant workers”) at the request of the Korea Urban Development Act at the construction site of this case.

C. As the Korea Urban Development failed to pay wages to the instant workers because of the lack of payment of the instant construction cost from the Gelim Construction, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 370,760,000 on behalf of the instant workers, and received the said wage claim from the instant workers around November 30, 2010.

Korea Urban Development is the construction cost of this case against the Do Forest Construction on September 1, 2011.