beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who has been in charge of credit management duties while working at the victims Ccredit Union located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from July 10, 200 to September 201.
The Defendant, who is engaged in the credit management business of the CFF, has a duty to perform credit business with the approval of the president in accordance with the Credit Regulations of CFFFC, and the “credit loans” and “credit loans within the scope of KRW 3 million and KRW 10 million shall be handled with the approval of the president, and the “credit loans” in excess of KRW 10 million have a duty to perform credit business with the approval of the president, subject to the decision of the Credit Council.
However, on January 31, 2007, the Defendant violated his duties, and around January 31, 2007, extended the repayment period for the credit loans of KRW 22 million borrowed under the name of the Defendant without obtaining the approval of the president, with the application for extension of the loan and the application for extension of the loan repayment period, and obtained the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 22 million from the victim Ccredit Union, and suffered economic damage equivalent to the same amount.
In addition, from January 28, 2010 to January 28, 2010, the Defendant extended the term of loan repayment to Defendant’s full-time Defendant, E, and F, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 42 million in total, and KRW 37.99 million in the Defendant’s wife D’s “credit loan” in the Defendant’s wife E, KRW 12.99 million in total, and KRW 16 million in the Defendant’s father’s “credit loan within the scope” in the Defendant’s father’s name, and KRW 1.6 million in total, and KRW 1.6 million in total, and KRW 1.6 million in the Defendant’s father’s “credit loan” and “loan within the scope” in the Defendant’s name, without the consent of the president, and conducted a new loan extension period to Defendant, D, E, and F, thereby incurring property damage equivalent to KRW 108,980,00 in total to the Victim’s Credit Union.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.