logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2010.10.27 2009고합485 (3)
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임) 등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for seven years, Defendant B imprisonment for ten months, and Defendant C for a fine of seven million won, respectively.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[209Gohap485] Defendant A, as the head of the credit and bond team of the M&A (hereinafter “M&A”), has overall control over the affairs related to credit and bond management, and took charge of the affairs such as requesting appraisal of collateral, verifying the appropriateness of appraisal and assessment.

Defendant

A In dealing with loan business, it is necessary to review whether the real estate to be offered as security is appropriate for security through a field investigation, to verify the errors in the preparation of an appraisal report prepared by an external appraisal institution, the appropriateness of the contents, etc., and to ascertain the appropriateness of the amount of appraisal and assessment by ascertaining the transaction value and the actual transaction value recorded in the copy of the register, and to take sufficient measures to recover the loan, such as conducting the loan with the approval of the executive director and the president, in accordance with the provisions of the Melecommunication, and to prevent damage to the M

1. Defendant A’s loan of KRW 280 million in the name of N around October 2006, upon receiving an application for a loan from N to borrow KRW 280 million in the name of N as security a loan of KRW 14,019 square meters in Qujin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, P, and KRW 403 square meters in the R. 403 square meters in the name of P (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the above land”) from the M.M. around October 206, Defendant A appears to have written the written indictment of KRW 12,50 million in the indictment from P, and the said real estate is treated as a clerical error.

With knowledge of the fact that the appraisal value of the above real estate purchased in a considerable amount of money and the appraisal value of the real estate did not reach KRW 508,887,00,00 and KRW 280,000,000 as collateral, it was reasonable to lend the above real estate to the Corporation in the name of N on October 27, 2006 after obtaining approval from the president of the New Credit Union and obtaining the approval of the president of the Credit Union.

As a result, Defendant A violates his duties and thereby owns the amount of KRW 280 million to the O.

arrow