beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the defendant A and B's appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs and the defendants A and B.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as described in paragraph (2) below. Thus, this is cited pursuant to the main sentence
(The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff and the Defendants in the trial are not different as already alleged in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial along with the evidence submitted in the first instance trial, the judgment of the court of first instance that partly accepted the Plaintiffs’ claims against the Defendant A and B, and that the judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed all of the Plaintiffs’ claims against the remaining Defendants is justifiable). 2. In the second part of the third part, the “J division” in the third part is deemed to be “H division.”
Part 4, "K" in Part 11 shall be improved to "M".
The first instance court's "this Court" shall be deemed to be the Daejeon District Court's Support.
From the 7th page, the "five persons" in the 2nd sentence shall be "four persons".
In Part 9, "1,00,000" in Part 4 shall be raised as "one million won."
Part 12, part 3 and 4 "52 new members" shall be raised to "52 new members from among new members."
Part 14 6 to 14 are as follows:
Although the Plaintiff F branch of the F branch of the F branch of the F branch of the Plaintiff asserts that it sustained losses from the partnership expenses of KRW 72,169,540 in order to oppose the scenarios of the Defendant A and B, each of the statements in subparagraphs A through 71 is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”
Part 16, "for 127.7 hours" in Part 13 shall be "127.7 hours", and the "act of dispute" in Part 14 of the same Act shall be raised as "industrial action".
From the 17th page to the 5th page, the “re-property damage” is raised as “=property damage”.
Part 18 "B" in Part 6 from below to "B".
3. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.
The appeal by the plaintiffs, the defendant A, and B is without merit.