logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2016.10.26 2016누10179
토지수용에 대한 보상금증액청구
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the contents of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

R refers to the “R” (as from the second to the fifth) as “S”.

Each “M” (Class 3, 12, 16, 4, 13, 5, and 8) shall be raised to each “G”. The 6, 6, 3, 4, 5, and 8 shall be brought to each “G.

The term " Q" (No. 6) shall be improved to "J".

2.(c)

4) In full view of the overall purport of the images and arguments in the evidence Nos. 11 through 13 of Part 9 (the project of this case from No. 9 to No. 4), it is recognized that considerable parts of the roads and parking lots inside the plaintiff company's factory are incorporated into the road to be newly constructed as the project of this case, and the said new road is adjacent to the entrance and exit of the plaintiff company's factory. However, the above evidence alone is insufficient to recognize that the construction of this case is not sufficient to recognize that there is a need for new construction to ensure access roads and parking lots due to the blocking or large vehicles accessible to the plaintiff company by the construction of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there is no other reason. Accordingly, this part of the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is consistent with this conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow