beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 24, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor in the Incheon District Court for fraud, and the judgment was finalized on May 2, 2009.
In fact, the Defendant had been promoting the sales agency business of the Gu C commercial buildings and the Sung-nam City, Sungnam-si, but had not been promoted properly, and there was no special revenue, and thus, it was in a bad credit position. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim E or used the credit card in the name of the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay it properly, and acquired property or pecuniary profits from the victim by deceiving the victim as follows.
1. On June 2, 2008, the Defendant: (a) before the Bank of Korea located in the Gungdong-dong, Gungdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) issued 25 percent’s cashier’s checks issued by the victim to the effect that “If the Defendant borrowed KRW 5,000,000 from the inside of the ship to the inside of the ship and only one month as the Defendant requires, he would pay interest of KRW 10% per month; and (c) there is a her birth who performs the test in Gangnam-gu; and (d) he would give interest of KRW 15,00,000 if the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 30,000,000,000 per month; and (c) the Defendant received 25 percent’s checks issued by the victim on the same day.
2. The Defendant, around July 15, 2008, received KRW 1,980,000 on the same day from the victim to the corporate bank account in F’s name, on the following grounds: “If the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,00,000 to the customer, it would have no entertainment expenses to have the customer contact with the customer; and if the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,00,000,000, it would have been repaid until August 15, 2008.”
3. On July 23, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant lends KRW 3,000,000 to the customer as it did not have entertainment expenses to have the customer contact with the customer, the Defendant would have the customer repay until September 12, 2008.” The Defendant received KRW 2,970,000 on the same day from the victim to the account.
4. On August 8, 2008, the Defendant, at the above-sale office, is a trader with the victim.