logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.08 2015고정718
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who vicariously performs the duties of the president of the partnership of B Housing Redevelopment Project Association.

Anyone who is the chairperson of a promotion committee or a project implementer of a rearrangement project shall comply with the request within 15 days, where the chairperson of the promotion committee or the project implementer requests the perusal or reproduction of documents or related materials concerning the implementation of the rearrangement project, such as operational regulations

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around June 23, 2014, requested documents or related data related to the implementation of the rearrangement project, including 15 items, such as the statement of evaluation related to state and public land, contract-related, details of consultation, free payment, request for free size, etc., and 15 items such as the separate indication of state and public land, etc., from the time when the Chairperson of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee for the Implementation of the Rearrangement Project (C) requested documents related to the implementation of the rearrangement project or related data at least five times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, even though he/she requested copies or copies of the documents or related data on the implementation of the rearrangement project, within 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. Each investigation report (Submission of materials who have filed a complaint);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as document numbers (B non-Subrogation 0623);

1. Article 86 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and Articles 86 and 81 (6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents,

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant confessions and reflects the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant was in charge of acting as the president of an association around June 2014 after the dismissal of the former president of an association, and the request for disclosure of the decision seems not to have been easy for the Defendant to make a determination as to whether to disclose it.

arrow