The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts charged in this case that the defendant led to the confession of his mistake, and the defendant did not have the same criminal record, and that the defendant does not have good economic conditions as a basic living recipient, is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the following facts are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In light of the legislative intent of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, the crime of this case was committed in order to protect the victim by establishing a compensation guarantee system for damages caused by the operation of a two-wheeled vehicle (motor vehicle), and the defendant did not be less than that of the crime, and the defendant actually operated the two-wheeled vehicle in this case and caused

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, etc. of the defendant, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.