The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (700,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant led to the confession of the facts charged in this case, and his mistake is divided, only the defendant has been punished by a fine, the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of offense, and the defendant seems not to have good economic conditions are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the following facts are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In light of the legislative intent of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, the crime of this case is not easy to protect the victim by establishing a compensation guarantee system for damages caused by the operation of motor vehicles.

Although the Defendant did not have paid a traffic accident while driving a motor vehicle in this case, if human life damage occurs due to an accident while driving a motor vehicle without mandatory insurance, the victim is likely to avoid receiving minimum compensation for damage.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.