Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with Defendant A’s duties, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, who was in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, in which he had a dispute with the husband B, who was the husband, and was her husband, and was her husband at the floor, her disturbance, such as taking the stringer on the table, which was her husband, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force.

2. The Defendants, at around 23:40 on October 6, 2016, discovered that, after receiving a report from 112 that “G convenience stores located in F in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, the Defendants were fighting at the drinking house” and that, at the site, the Defendant, who was designated as the slope I belonging to H District in the Sungnam Police Station H District of the Sungnam-nam Police Station, called the reporter as a scambling person at the drinking house, was scam along the roadway with the vehicular road and the sidewalk, and asked Defendant B to present his identification card, the Defendants expressed that “I scam, scam, scam, and scam together with the house, scambling at the bar, scambling at the bar, scam, scam, and scambling at the bar, the Defendants were scambling with the Defendant’s 1’s face, and scambling at the bar.

As a result, Defendant B interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties and the maintenance of public order, and Defendant A interfered with the police officer’s 112 reported duties and lawful performance of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to I or K by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by telephone from relevant witnesses);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act is applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the defendant A who choose a sentence.