1. Defendant B, C, Korea Electric Power Corporation, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J shall describe the “sale price” column in the attached Table from each Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s reconstruction project is carried out 1) The Plaintiff’s reconstruction project for housing reconstruction of 54,98 square meters in Northern-gu L and MJ 54,98.80 square meters (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

(2) On December 30, 2008, the Pohang Port Mayor was authorized to implement the instant reconstruction project, and on August 18, 2016, approved the instant reconstruction project management and disposal plan on which August 18, 2016 was approved.

B. The relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendants indicated in paragraph 11 of the attached list of real estate located within the instant reconstruction project zone, and the remainder Defendants owned and possessed each of the real estate listed in the attached table “owned real estate” column in the instant reconstruction project zone, and the Plaintiff was the Plaintiff’s member. 2) The Plaintiff resolved to dismiss Defendant K at the extraordinary general meeting on July 11, 2015.

3) The Plaintiff received an application for parcelling-out from its members from February 24, 2016 to April 3, 2016, and the Defendants did not file an application for parcelling-out during the said period. [Grounds for recognition] The Defendants did not file an application for parcelling-out during the said period. [In the absence of dispute, Gap Nos. 2, 4 through 10, Eul evidence No. 1 (if there is a provisional number, including a branch number; the same shall apply

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. On July 11, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that Defendant K was removed from the Plaintiff’s association and became subject to cash liquidation, and that the Plaintiff and the Defendant K are deemed to have concluded a sales contract on the real estate indicated in paragraph (11) of the attached Table of the real estate following the date following the expiration date of the period for application for parcelling-out, and that Defendant K was obligated to pay the liquidation money to the Plaintiff, while Defendant K received the settlement money from the Plaintiff, to implement the procedures for ownership transfer registration and deliver the said real estate to the Plaintiff.

In addition to the statement Nos. 2 and 5, the plaintiff's defendant K.