logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.02.12 2013가합35887
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendants shall receive each of the money stated in the “sale price” column in the attached Table 1 from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a reconstruction association established pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”) to promote a reconstruction project of Mapo-gu I Group of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “instant reconstruction project”). On November 2, 201, the Plaintiff is a reconstruction association established pursuant to the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to

The Defendants owned each of the instant real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estate”) within the instant reconstruction project zone and possess each of the instant real estate.

On August 17, 2012, the Plaintiff received project implementation authorization from the head of Mapo-gu, and publicly announced the application period for parcelling-out from October 7, 2013 to November 6, 2013.

The defendants did not file an application for parcelling-out during the period of the above application for parcelling-out.

관련 법령 ◎ 도시정비법(2013. 12. 24. 법률 제12116호로 개정되기 전의 것) 제47조(분양신청을 하지 아니한 자 등에 대한 조치) ① 사업시행자는 토지등소유자가 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 다음 각 호의 구분에 따른 날부터 150일 이내에 대통령령으로 정하는 절차에 따라 토지ㆍ건축물 또는 그 밖의 권리에 대하여 현금으로 청산하여야 한다.

1. A person who has failed to apply for parcelling-out or a person who has withdrawn an application for parcelling-out before the expiration of the period for application for parcelling-out: The project implementer under Article 39 (1) on the day following the expiration of the period for application for parcelling-out under Article 46 (1) may file a claim for sale of the land or buildings of any of the following persons when implementing a housing reconstruction project or a block-unit housing rearrangement project by applying mutatis mutandis Article

In such cases, the rebuilding resolution shall be deemed to have consented to the establishment of the association (in the case of subparagraph 3, referring to the consent to the designation of the project implementer), and divided ownership.

arrow