Seoul High Court 2013Nu1990 ( November 28, 2013)

(1) If the seizure is immediately cancelled, it appears that the deposit has been claimed. (2) If

(1) The Plaintiffs are obligated to immediately release the seizure, since they received a favorable judgment by filing a lawsuit on the ownership of the right to claim the recovery of deposit against the delinquent taxpayers, and the right to claim the recovery of deposit was known to the Plaintiffs at the time of seizure.

2013du26835 The revocation of revocation of an application to revoke the attachment disposition.

AAA and one other

b Head of the Tax Office

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu1990 Decided November 28, 2013

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent