logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.31 2014나2050102
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended and added in the trial.

Reasons

1. The court’s explanation of this part of the underlying facts is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the underlying facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the third chapter of the judgment of the first instance, “Defendant Han-do” is deemed to be “Korea Stock Company,” and the fourth chapter 3 is deemed to be “Defendant Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation,” respectively (hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph). Of the attached Table, the part corresponding to the items indicated in the “Catulation List” and the “Catulation of Remuneration Costs for each household of the entire parts” in the attached Table of this judgment and the “Catulation of Remuneration Costs for each household of the non-transferable parts of the entire parts of the household,” shall be removed or added as shown in the attached Table of this judgment, and the fifth section shall be as follows.

[Attachment 163, 167, 47, 279, 279, 47, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 179, 279, 279, 279, 279, 279, 377, 279, 279, 376, 47, 279, 47, 279, 279, 376, 47, 279, 279, 376, 47, 279, 376, 476, 279, 376, 197, 47, 297, 47, 297, 294, 3752,

arrow