2013Gohap121 Violation of the Public Official Election Act

1. Jindo (67****** 1********) and the head of an incorporated association.

Daejeon: Not more than Daejeon

Reference domicile Daejeon: Omission

2. ① (61******1*********) and non-service workers.

Daejeon: Not more than Daejeon

place of registration is not more than 70

3. Weightlocks (77***** 1********) representative of the company.

Daejeon: Not more than Daejeon

Reference domicile Daejeon: Omission

Public Security (Lawsuits) and Park Iron (Public Trial)

Attorney Park Jin-hoon (the national election for Defendant Jin-○)

The defendant 1 1, 1, 100 knife

Attorney Lee In-bok

May 9, 2013

Defendant Jindo shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won, china, 1.00 won, china, 1.000 won, 2.5 million won, respectively.

of this section.

Defendant for the period calculated by converting 50,000 won into one day when the Defendants did not pay the above fines;

shall be confined in each old ward.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Criminal facts

Defendant (1) Both Defendants (i) are the chairman of culture and arts center of the Central Headquarters of Preferred Movables, which is the panty club group of Preliminary Candidates, for the 18th presidential election. Defendant Mackdae is the director of the Daejeon Headquarters of Preferred Movables, and Defendant Dak-○, a member of the Daejeon Headquarters of Preferred Movables, is the director of the Black Memorial Association, the director of the Korean Association, and the senior managing director of the Korea Federation.

1. The defendant 1 / her quantity, her joint criminal conduct

On November 16, 2012, 18: At around 30, 2012, the Defendants held the events of "allied mother of the Daejeon World Property Daejeon Headquarters," which is a regular group of members belonging to the Daejeon World Property Daejeon Headquarters, for the sake of the director of the headquarters of the Daejeon World Property Daejeon and the director of the branch office.

피고인들은 위 행사에 ' 근혜동산 대전본부 ' 의 정식회원이 아닌 비회원들에게도 입회 신청서를 받아 참석시키기로 하고 행사장 입구에 입회신청서를 비치한 다음 , 최병철 등 비회원 72명으로부터 1인당 회비 10 , 000원을 받아 위 행사에 참석하도록 한 뒤 이 에게 1인당 시가 23 , 000원 상당의 뷔페식 저녁식사를 제공하였다 . 위 행사에서 ' 근혜동 산 중앙본부 ' 회장 김주복은 " 박근혜 후보님이 큰 뜻을 이루기 위해서는 우리 모두가 힘을 합쳐야 하고 , 특히 이곳 대전에서 , 충남에서 , 충북에서 우리가 똘똘 뭉쳐서 이번 에 한번 해내야 합니다 . " 라고 발언하였고 , 새누리당 국회의원 박성효는 " 우리가 이미 여성대통령 시대를 예보한 것 같아요 . 5만 원 짜리가 나올 때 이미 대한민국 대통령은 박근혜 대통령이 될 것이라는 예견이 된 것 같습니다 . ' 잘 키운 딸 하나 , 열 아들 안 부럽다 . ' 이번 12월 선거에서 여러분이 실천해 주시기 바랍니다 . " 라고 발언하였다 .

In collusion, the Defendants provided 13,00 won per capita to 72 non-members, such as Bule Bale, for the foregoing preliminary candidate for the 18th presidential election ( = KRW 23,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 10,000) in total, for the 18th presidential election. The Defendants provided and donated property benefits equivalent to KRW 936,00,000.

2. Defendant Jin-○

On November 15, 2012, the Defendant had 30 persons present at the event of the 'Mosembling of the World War Headquarters', which is a member of the Black Posem Association (hereinafter referred to as the 'Mosembi et al.'). The Defendant requested that 30 persons participate in the event of the 'Mosembling of the World War Headquarters', which is a member of the Black Posem Association.

On November 16, 2012, 18: At around 30, the Defendant, at the request of the Red Government, etc., participated in the events of the Daejeon World War Headquarters, the following events: even though he is not a member of the regular meeting of the Daejeon World Property Headquarters, even though he is not a member of the regular meeting.

It granted 10,000 won to 22 persons, such as the largest Balebal, to participate in the above events.

As above, the Defendant provided 22 non-member members, such as Bright, etc., with an aggregate of KRW 10,000 per capita 220,000, to make contributions to the 18th presidential election.

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of the Judgment】

1. The defendant 1. The defendant 1. The defendant 1. The part of the knives legal statement

1. Defendant Jin-○’s legal statement

1. The statement of answer to the highest right to Between Between Before and 1;

1. The report on the result of the violation of election laws on January 1, 199, the venue of the event and the receipt thereof, the investigation report (the President of the Red Cross * *, this**, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the National Assembly *, the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member of the member cooperative

[Article 2]

1. Defendant Jin-○’s legal statement

1. The statement of answer to the highest right to Between Between Before and 1;

1. Kim **, Kim ***, Kim *, Kim *, this*, this*,**, Park *, river**, this*, this**, one*, one *, one *, one * *, one * a result of the investigation of a violation of the Election Act 1. Each written confirmation **

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

Defendant Jin-○: Articles 257(1)1 and 115 (Selection of Fines) of the Public Official Election Act

Defendant 1, Defendant 1, Maternal: Article 257(1)1, Article 115 of the Public Official Election Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines)

2. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code

3. Order of provisional payment; and

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Judgment on the assertion of Defendant 1, 1, knife and his defense counsel

1. The assertion;

Although the Defendants provided 72 non-member members of the "Plue House, etc." with a total of KRW 936,00,000 at the expense of the "Plue House", the Defendants merely provided a courtesy meal to those who participated in the events of the "Plue House" and the "Plue House", which is a regular meeting to take the position of the head of the Daejeon Headquarters of Nlue Movables and the head of the branch office, so there was no intention to make a contribution to the Defendants for the "Plue candidate" in relation to the presidential election.

2. Determination

A. Relevant legal principles

The intent of the crime of contribution act is to form the criminal facts under the Public Official Election Act, and the above recognition requires strict proof. However, in a case where the defendant denies the criminal intent of contribution act, it is inevitable to prove by the method of proving indirect facts having considerable relevance with the intention due to the nature of the object, and what constitutes indirect facts having considerable relevance with the intent should be determined by the method of determining the link of facts by using the secret observation or analysis power based on the normal empirical rule (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do7205, Nov. 16, 2007, etc.).

B. Determination

이 법원이 적법하게 조사하여 채택한 증거들을 종합하여 알 수 있는 다음의 사정들 , 즉 ① ' 근혜동산 ' 은 박근혜를 지지하는 모임으로서 , 연령과 직업 , 사회적 지위나 신분 또는 빈부에 관계없이 박근혜에 대한 정확한 정보 , 의견 등을 교류하고 , 박근혜를 성 원 , 지지하기 위하여 구성된 모임인 점 ( 근혜동산 운영회칙 제2조 , 증거기록 125쪽 ) , ② 위 ' 근혜동산 ' 의 하부조직인 ' 근혜동산 대전본부 ' 는 2009 . 11 . 경 창립되었지만 그로부터 약 3년 동안 공식적인 모임 내지 활동을 가지지 않았고 회비도 받지 않다가 ( 증거기록 54 , 106 , 114 , 293 , 298쪽 ) , 제18대 대통령선거일 ( 2012 . 12 . 19 . ) 을 불과 한 달 앞두고 대전지역 본부장 등을 선출하면서 위 ' 근혜동산 대전본부 연합정모 ' 행사를 개최하였던 점 , ③ 그런데 위 행사의 내용은 대부분 제18대 대통령선거의 새누리당 예비후보자였 던 박근혜를 지지하는 것으로서 , ' 근혜동산 중앙본부 ' 회장 김주복 , 새누리당 국회의원 박성효가 판시 기재와 같이 위 박근혜를 지지하는 선언을 하였고 ( 증거기록 375 ~ 376 , 385 ~ 386쪽 ) , 새누리당 국회의원 이한성 , 새누리당 비상대책위원 이상돈도 위 대통령 선거와 관련하여 회원들을 격려하는 취지의 발언을 하였으며 ( 증거기록 377 ~ 383쪽 ) , " 박근혜 대통령 ! " 이라는 건배사도 하였던 점 ( 증거기록 187 , 189 , 193 , 232 , 242쪽 ) , ① 당시 행사장에서 위 이상돈의 저서 ' 대통령 선택의 조건 ' 이 참석자들에게 판매되기도 하였던 점 ( 증거기록 59 ~ 60 , 189 , 192 , 195쪽 ) , ⑤ 근혜동산 운영회칙에 따르면 , 근혜 동산의 모임에 정치인의 참여가 원칙적으로 금지되어 있는데 ( 제39조 제4항 , 증거기록 135쪽 ) , 위 행사에는 정치인인 새누리당 국회의원 이한성 , 박성효 ( 근혜동산의 회원도 아니었다 . ) , 새누리당 비상대책위원 이상돈 등이 참석하였고 , 다른 참석자들도 위 행사 에 국회의원 등의 정치인이 참석한다는 것을 알고 있었던 점 ( 증거기록 167 , 177 , 179 , 199 ~ 200쪽 ) , ⑥ 위 행사의 참석하여 피고인들로부터 뷔페식 저녁식사를 제공받았던 127명 중 72명은 근혜동산의 회원이 아니었던 점 ( 그 중 50명은 회원가입신청서조차 작 성하지 않았다 ) , ⑦ 피고인들은 위 행사에 앞서 근혜동산 중앙본부 수석부회장으로부터 " 비회원으로부터 회원가입신청서를 제출받고 , 회비도 받아야 공직선거법 위반이 되지 않는다 . " 는 안내를 받고서도 위 행사 당시 참석자들을 입장시키면서 회원 여부를 확인 하는 절차를 거치지 않았던 점 ( 증거기록 321쪽 ) , ⑧ 피고인들은 행사장 입구에 회원가 입신청서를 20장 이상 비치하여 위 행사에 비회원이 참석할 수 있다는 것을 이미 예상 하고 있었던 점 ( 증거기록 81 ~ 102 , 321쪽 ) , ⑨ 그런데 근혜동산 운영회칙에 따르면 , 회 원가입신청서를 제출하더라도 ' 중앙본부 및 각 본부 , 지부의 승인을 받은 뒤에야 ' 비로 소 근혜동산의 정회원이 되는 점 ( 제8조 , 증거기록 126쪽 ) , ① 피고인들은 위 행사에 앞서 대전광역시 선거관리위원회로부터 위 행사에 관하여 안내공문을 받았는데 , 그 문 서에는 공직선거법 위반사례로 " 행사 참석자에게 식사를 제공하거나 , 행사 참석의 대 가로 참석자에게 금품을 제공하는 행위 " , " 팬클럽이 회원이 아닌 다수의 일반 선거구민 을 참석시켜 행사를 개최하는 행위 " , " 팬클럽이 선거승리를 위한 결의를 다지거나 그 의지를 확인하기 위한 집회를 개최하는 행위 " 등 판시 범죄사실과 관련된 내용이 기재 되어 있었고 , 그 무렵 위 선거관리위원회 직원으로부터 위 공문내용에 관한 간략한 설 명도 들었던 점 ( 212 ~ 216쪽 ) 등을 종합하여 보면 , 피고인들에게는 위와 같이 비회원 들에게 식사비용을 제공함으로써 ' 대통령선거에 관하여 박근혜 예비후보자를 위하여 ' 기부행위를 한다는 범의가 적어도 미필적으로는 있었다고 판단된다 . 피고인들 및 변호 인의 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다 .

Reasons for sentencing

1. Defendant Jin-○

(a) The scope of punishment: Fines not exceeding 10 million won;

(b) Application of the sentencing criteria;

[Determination of Type] Election Crimes, Violation of the prohibition and restriction on contribution acts, and contribution acts

【Special Convicted Persons】

Aggravations: for unspecified or large number of other parties or over a considerable period of time;

Where he/she commits a crime repeatedly;

Reduction element: where money or valuables provided or profits are extremely insignificant;

[Determination on the recommended Area] Fine of 1 million won to fine of 5 million won (basic area)

(c) Determination of sentence: Fine of 1.5 million won; and

【Unfavorable Circumstances】

○ The Defendant urged students to attend the panty club event supporting the 18th presidential election campaign, and provided membership fees, thereby impairing the fair and proper judgment of voters, thereby impairing the fairness of election.

【Beneficial Conditions】

Money and valuables provided to ○ is relatively minor.

○ The Defendant was the first offender and recognized as committing the instant crime, and his mistake is divided. 2. The Defendant 1, 1, 100 knives, knives

(a) The scope of punishment by a fine not exceeding 10 million won; and

(b) Application of the sentencing criteria;

[Determination of Type] Each election crime, violation of the prohibition and restriction on contribution act, and contribution act

【Special Convicted Persons】

Aggravations: For each unspecified or large number of other parties or over a reasonable period of time;

In the case of repeated crimes

Measures to be mitigated: customary and courtesy acts other than Article 112(2) of each official election law;

[Determination on the recommended Area] Each fine of one million won to five million won (basic area)

(c) Determination of sentence: Fines of 2.5 million won; and

【Unfavorable Circumstances】

○ The Defendants held a pan club event that supports the election that was a preliminary candidate by staying in the 18th presidential election, and provided meals to many unspecified general electorates who are not members of the 18th presidential election, thereby undermining the fair and correct judgment of voters, thereby infringing on the fairness of election.

【Beneficial Conditions】

○ The Defendants do not have any previous error.

○ The Defendants’ mistake is divided by the Defendants.

【Other Normal Conditions】

Considering the circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc. that led to the Defendants to commit the instant crime because the Defendants did not well have any relevant regulations, such as the Public Official Election Act, while holding a meeting of pan clubs regularly.

Judge Lee Jong-soo

Judges Kim Jong-hoon

Judges' records