Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a game hall in the name of “D” on the floor C and 1st of each week.

No person shall provide game water for use different from the content of the rating.

Nevertheless, the defendant from the end of April 2015 to the same year.

7. From April 1, 2015, the Game Water Management Committee used the game products in such a way that, after entering the game with an adult certification procedure on April 1, 2015 in the above game, it charged capital with mobile phone payment, transfer of accounts, deposits without passbook, merchandise coupons, coophones, etc., and purchases coo (Class 8) with the charged capital, it provided the game products by means of directly charging the game money by directly using the game products, which is an Internet game product classified as the method of payment (indirect charging) by which the game money is paid by the game money, without the adult certification and membership procedure, without the adult certification and membership procedure, and by linking the game with three ASEAN (H, I, and J) granted by the Defendant by accessing the game to the manager (K).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Verification of classification and determination of grades, response to the results of appraisal, and a statement of each game;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry (Selection of Penalty) concerning the punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Since the head of the State did not provide a game product that altered the program, the game product of this case was not provided for the use of the content different from the degree of the game product, but did not provide the game product of this case by directly charging game money.

2. It is closely related to the realization of the content of the game product as well as the content of the game product itself.