Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant did not pay 4,300 won of taxi charges without justifiable grounds, even though he/she arrived at F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. E. E., for the purpose of getting on and off a D taxi operated by the injured party C at the taxi platform in Gyeyang-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si.

2. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) paid a taxi fee in front of the H district located in the Hayang-gu G in Manyang-gu, Mayang-gu; (b) “A taxi customer will take a bath and does not pay a fee”; and (c) “A passenger will take a visit report from the circumstances in which the H district is affiliated with the H district, who was called and called, return home without any other reason”; and (d) was frighted by C C’s chest, “I will take a bath, and do so without any other reason.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to handling of damage reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of freeboard), and Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, the selection of fines for crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months on September 10, 2015 by a court on September 10, 2015 by obstructing the performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 18th of the same month. The repeated act of the same kind of crime during the suspended sentence period - the defendant recognized his mistake: the favorable circumstances: the defendant recognized his mistake; the network disorder suffered by the defendant seems to have affected the crime of this case; the victimized police officer wanted the defendant's wife.