1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A (GG) is an I Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) Defendant E is the head of the Defendant hospital, who is the operator of the Defendant hospital and the medical staff thereof, and Defendant F is a medical specialist working at the Defendant hospital, who provides medical treatment and surgery to Plaintiff A, who is a medical specialist working at the Defendant hospital.

B. The Plaintiff A, who had been treated at another hospital before the Defendant Hospital’s hospital, was hospitalized at the Daejeon University Hospital’s oriental medical hospital located at 176, 75, as the symptoms occurred from January 25, 2010 to the point of view that both arms and legs are low, and that the symptoms continue to exist. From January 30, 2010 to February 12, 2010, Plaintiff A received physical therapy and pharmacologic treatment, etc. by hospitalized at the Daejeon University Hospital located at 75, 176, as Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon. From February 16, 2010 to March 13, 2010, Plaintiff A received physical therapy and pharmacologic treatment, etc. by being hospitalized with the same symptoms as the symptoms.

C. The Plaintiff 1 et al., on March 16, 2010, did not show symptoms, such as perjury, even during the continuous hospitalization as above, and the Plaintiff 1 et al., applied to the Defendant Hospital on March 16, 2010. At that time, the main symptoms of the Plaintiff complained of were “at the time,” including “at the time of the Plaintiff’s birth to the Defendant Hospital,” “at the time of the Plaintiff’s entry into the Defendant Hospital, there was no urology at the time of the Plaintiff’s entry into the Defendant Hospital, but there was no urology at the time of the Plaintiff’s entry into the Defendant Hospital, but around February 4, 2010, the Plaintiff 1 said that “at the time of urology, urine was satched without urine,” and that “at the time of the Plaintiff’s entrance into the Defendant Hospital on February 10, 2010, 2010, 20.

3.6.

3.8.8.

3.In 11. Coordinates;