Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users in Daegu District Court and Racing Support for the Defendant, which became final and conclusive on November 2, 201, and is currently under suspension of execution.

1. On June 2, 2008, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by being sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court and the racing support area, and on January 8, 2009, in the Daegu District Court and the racing support area, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for the crimes of violating the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

Nevertheless, at around 22:20 on February 1, 2013, the Defendant driven Cpoter vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.156% from approximately 25 meters to the front road of Dongcheon-dong-dong, Dongcheon-si, Dongcheon-si.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of CPoter Cargo Vehicles.

The defendant, as stated in paragraph (1), driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as stated in paragraph (1), and continued the road prior to the sale and distribution in Dongcheon-dong at the front of the racing-dong from the front side of the racing-dong to the Dongcheon-dong underground map.

At the time, vehicles are parked on both sides of the road, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as driving the motor vehicle after checking the safety of the course by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went into operation on the right side of the vehicle, which is owned by the victim D, who was parked on the right side of the course, and the fenced part of the vehicle was collisioned with the front side of the vehicle's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.