A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:00 on February 25, 2020, the Defendant discussed about the size of investment and operational strategies for the project with the victim D (year 52) in the C store located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul and discussed about the scale of investment and operational strategies for the project. On the ground that the victim's opinion does not coincide with the victim's opinion, the Defendant sold the beer, which was located in the wall of the above B, to the victim's face and continuously at least 6 weeks of the victim's face, and then sold the beer, back head, back, back, back, ear, son, kick, and so on at least 5 weeks of the victim's face, and sold the beer part, the two parts, and the inner part of the inner part, which require treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

Copy of Medical Records

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV video CDs and CCTV images major pages;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to ten years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of punishment] according to the sentencing guidelines, which includes no special injury, repeated crime [the category 1] and no special injury [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the recommended punishment], six months to two years [ the scope of the recommended punishment modified according to the applicable sentencing], one year to two years (the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended in the sentencing guidelines is set according to the law applicable sentencing standards, because the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended in the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory applicable applicable sentences).

3. Determination of sentence: The defendant's opinion on the size of investment and operational strategies for the business with the victim is not consistent with the victim's opinion, and it is not good that he/she has committed two or more weeks of the victim's ma, back head, sin, etc. at a number of times, and multiple sins of the inner and inner part, and that it seems that the degree of damage is too serious.

However, the defendant is fully aware of and against the crime of this case, and the defendant is in the same kind.