logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.07 2018가단9678
임금 등
Text

1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 34,845,00, and KRW 28,875,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from January 15, 2018.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of the claim (1) The employee, including the plaintiffs, provided labor at the request of the head of the site office of the defendant who is an employee of the defendant from November 1, 2017 to December 31 of the same year at the site of the Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, and Ebable Corporation, but did not receive wages as indicated in the attached Table [Attachment Table]; (2) the employee, listed in the attached Tables 2 through 18, transferred the wage claim amounting to KRW 31,445,00 to the plaintiff on May 8, 2018; and (3) notified the defendant of the above transfer on May 11, 2018; and (4) the employee, listed in the attached Tables 20 to 27, 200,000 won, transferred the wage claim amounting to the plaintiff B on May 8, 2018, or notified the defendant of the fact that there is no dispute between the parties as to the transfer number and the entire statement number.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 34,845,00 (=the amount of KRW 31,445,000 paid to Plaintiff A’s wage of KRW 3,40,000), the amount of KRW 28,875,000 paid to Plaintiff B (=the amount of KRW 25,200 paid to Plaintiff’s wage of KRW 3,675,00) and each of the above amounts of KRW 14 days after the date of retirement from January 15, 2018 to the date of complete payment).

2. The Defendant alleged that the Defendant paid wages to the Plaintiffs in accordance with the direct payment agreement, but there was a direct payment agreement between the Plaintiff, the Busan integrated Construction Corporation and the Defendant on the basis of the written evidence in subparagraphs 1 through 4.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit, since it is not sufficient to recognize that comprehensive construction of ambia has paid wages to the plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. If so, the Plaintiffs’ instant case.

arrow