본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.08.30 2013고단2216
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A around March 7, 2005, an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged, committed a violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads prior to the control of Dol-dong Dol-dong Dol-dong Dol-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, on March 7, 2005. 2. The penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on December 29, 201 are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 2010; 201Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010; 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009). Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.