logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.06.28 2013고단1018
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around 11:50 on January 24, 2005, which is an employee of a specific criminal defendant in the facts charged, a violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads prior to the control of 7-on-line mobile vehicle driving (type of over-line mobile driving restrictions) on the national highways of the overseas-dong-Eup-si, Gyeonggi-si; 2. The penal provisions applied to summary orders subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 201; 2010Hun-Ga38, Oct. 28, 2010; 2008Hun-Ga17, Jul. 30, 2009]. Thus, a defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow