beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of the claim is that from November 2017 to December 21, 2018, pursuant to the Defendant’s production order, the Plaintiff supplied printed matters to the Defendant; and the fact that the amount unpaid by the Defendant is 8,791,600 is either a dispute between the parties or that the entire purport of the pleading is added to the statement in subparagraph 1-3.
Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the printing price of KRW 8,791,600 and damages for delay.
2. The defendant asserts that the defendant's claim for offset against the plaintiff's damages incurred additional costs of KRW 6,638,034, 2,054,80, 633,60, 2,66,750, 2,46,750, 1,028, 280, 2,145,00, and 8,000,000, in total of KRW 22,96,46,4646, and 644, in order to re-work with defects in the printed materials supplied by the plaintiff, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for remedy against the above damages.
Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and the purport of the entire pleadings in Eul evidence 1 through 6 (including the number of pages), there was a defect in the supplied printed materials even though the plaintiff decided to examine the defect in the printed materials. The defendant believed that the plaintiff's printed materials are complete products without any defect and carried out the subsequent process of hosting, etc. and delivered them to the defendant's customer, but the defect was discovered, and returned to the plaintiff or disposed of, or disposed of. The defendant incurred the cost of KRW 14,966,464 in total from March 6, 2018 to October 26, 2018 in re-working due to the defect in the printed materials supplied by the plaintiff. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the damage in this part.
The plaintiff asserts that freight charges, the value of the paper dated June 26, 2018, etc. cannot be recognized, but the defendant's printed materials supplied by the plaintiff through the subsequent process.