logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.11 2017나6895
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff regarding the amount of payment ordered below.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the purpose of producing various printed materials.

B. From April 23, 2016 to April 24, 2016, the Defendant was employed by the Plaintiff as a one-time printing book, and printed Category A among E and F printed materials (hereinafter “instant printed materials”).

C. The Plaintiff supplied the instant printed materials to the G company, but the G company opened the writing on the E page among the instant printed materials, and notified the Plaintiff that the F printed materials cannot be used as normal products because they were too printed.

The Plaintiff confirmed the above defects in the instant printed materials, and re-printed and supplied the instant printed materials to G Company, calculated the amount of damage incurred from the additional production of teaching materials by G Company as KRW 1,672,600, and deducted the Plaintiff’s printing price from the Plaintiff’s G Company.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding that the Defendant was liable for damages, since the Defendant failed to manage the quality of printing of the instant printed materials while working as a printed book, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to such nonperformance of obligation as above.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Plaintiff suffered damages of KRW 1,672,00,00 in total, and KRW 5,000,000 in total, due to the decline in sales, due to quality incidents of the instant printed materials, and KRW 1,150,40 in total, and KRW 7,823,000 in total, due to the decline in sales.

(2) (A) According to the above evidence, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,150,400 to the re-printed cost due to the quality accident of the instant printed materials, and the Plaintiff deducted KRW 1,672,600 out of the Plaintiff's printing price for G company, thereby compensating the Defendant for damages arising from the additional production.

arrow