Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

When the accused does not pay a fine, the period of 100,000 won shall be converted.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2018, the Defendant, at around 17:40, drive BW125 Orala, which is owned by the Defendant, as his duties, was going to proceed in the direction of hobal direction, depending on the two-lane roads in front of D stores in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, depending on the two-lane roads in front of D stores in Gangdong-gu Seoul.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, Otoba is a person engaged in driving service, due to the negligence of the centering on the center line in violation of the duty of care to safely operate without breaking the center line, and due to the negligence of the centering on the port from the right side of the course, the bridge of the victim E (n, 54 years old) (n, 54 years old) was placed as the front wheels part of the direction.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a franchis team or other franchisium, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports and diagnostic certificates;

1. Penalty provisions: Article 3 (1) and the proviso to (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty Provisions)

1. At the core station: The reason for the occurrence of an accident in the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant gets on the center line and operated the center line, and the victim who gets on the center line is not able to properly look at the vehicle from the center line to the center line. Thus, if the defendant was not on the center line, the accident would not occur if she did not drive the center line. Thus, the defendant's median line is consistent with the cause of the accident, but the center line is to ensure safety between the vehicles traveling in the opposite direction, and thus, it is to protect the trust that pedestrians who want to cross without permission were bound by a signal to the center line, and thus, the vehicle in the nearest lane does not run beyond the center line.