The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car B K5 vehicle.

On June 15, 2015, the Defendant got out of the center line, while proceeding to the legal interest school in Ansan-si, Around 22:15, the Defendant got out of the center line.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely walk the center line without impeding the normal passage of other motor vehicles and to safely walk the center line. In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the front part of the injured party E (the injured party E(the injured party E(the injured party E(the injured party E) driving in the U-turn permitted zone with the central line of U.S. as it is, instead of neglecting this, conflicts with the front part of U.S. car with the front part of U.S. car's upper part.).

As a result, Defendant 2 suffered injury, such as salt dynasium to the right dynasium, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. The defendant alleged that he was negligent in the occurrence of an accident, but he was found to be a U.S. intern within the area where the U.S.ton was permitted, and thus, the Central Line did not intrude.

The argument is asserted.

3. Determination

A. The instant accident occurred in the U.S. where the Defendant had been making a U.S. to the U.S. to the U.S. to the U.S. to the U.S. line, and at the time, there was a safety sign allowing U.S. to make a U.S. to the U.S. line on the surface of the first line, which the Defendant waiting to make a U.S. to the U.S. line, and there was no sign indicating additional permissible times to the U.S. line sign installed on the signal, etc. to the U.S. to the U.

B. Of the proviso to the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Central Line Offense.