In cases where a registration has been made on a destroyed building or non-existent building, whether the owner of the site has a benefit to seek the implementation of the registration of ownership transfer or the procedure for cancellation of registration of ownership preservation against the registrant of the building (negative)

In the event a building is destroyed or lost, the owner of the site of the building applies for the registration of destruction by subrogation of the right holder registered on the register of the building pursuant to Article 101(1) and (4) of the Registration of Real Estate Act. In the event that a registration of destruction is made on a non-existent building, the owner of the site of the building can file an application for the registration of destruction by the above method pursuant to Articles 101-2(1) and (2), and 101(4) of the same Act. If the registration of destruction is made in accordance with the above procedure, the registration of destruction or loss may be completed even without the co-application or consent of the owner of the building. If the registration of destruction is made in accordance with the above procedure, the registration of ownership transfer and registration of preservation of ownership recorded on the register will lose its effect. Therefore, the owner of each building site of each building site of each of the above lawsuit against the title holder of the registration of ownership on the ground building and registration of preservation of ownership on the ground

[1] Articles 101(1) and (4), 101-2(1) and (2) of the Registration of Real Estate Act

Supreme Court Decision 73Da396 Decided July 24, 1973 (No. 21-1, 162) Supreme Court Decision 91Da39184 Decided March 31, 1992 (Gong192, 1414)

Sin Jong-gu et al. (Attorneys Jeong Jong-ho et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Vice Chief of Staff and two others

Jeju District Court Decision 201Na1448 delivered on August 1, 201

1. Of the instant lawsuit against the Plaintiff, the claim for cancellation of the registration of ownership transfer as to the building listed in [Attachment 2 and 3] of [Attachment 1] and the claim for cancellation of registration of ownership transfer as to the building listed in [Attachment 1] shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. Defendant Assistant Director shall:

(a) Of the lands listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 2 List, the part on the part within the line connected with each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, and 1, the part on the section 28 square meters in the line connected each point in sequence with each point of 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 5, and the part on the section 45 square meters in the line connected each point of 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 6, and 8, 9, 10, 11, 111, 13, and 6, the part on the part on the part on the line, excluding the part on the 5 square meters in the line connected each point in sequence with each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, and 8, respectively, and the land listed in the attached Table 2 List 2.

(1) Ground on the land listed in Annex 2 List 1;

(A) 27 m27 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m20 m23 and 18 in the line that connects each point in sequence with the indication of the attached Form 18,19,20,20, 21,22,23,

(나)같은 도면 표시 24, 23, 22, 21, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉳ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 2㎡를,

(2) Ground on the land listed in Annex 2 List 2

(가)별지 도면 표시 24, 21, 26, 25, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉴ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 15㎡를,

(나)같은 도면 표시 21, 20, 27, 26, 21의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉵ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 7㎡를,

(다)같은 도면 표시 42, 43, 48, 49, 42의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉶ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 17㎡를,

(라)같은 도면 표시 43, 44, 47, 48, 43의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉷ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 24㎡를,

(마)같은 도면 표시 44, 45, 46, 47, 44의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉸ 부분 창고 및 화장실 20㎡를,

(바)같은 도면 표시 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 28의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉹ 부분 거주용 방 및 화장실 113㎡를,

(사)같은 도면 표시 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 50의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉺ 부분 창고 16㎡를,

(아)같은 도면 표시 58, 59, 60, 61, 58의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉻ 부분 창고 8㎡를,

Each luxa Dora.

3.피고 이승희는 원고들에 대하여, 별지 2 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 43, 44, 47, 48, 43의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉷ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 24㎡ 및 같은 도면 표시 44, 45, 46, 47, 44의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉸ 부분 창고 및 화장실 20㎡에서 퇴거하라.

4.피고 김성균은 원고들에 대하여, 별지 2 목록 제1항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 24, 23, 22, 21, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉳ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 2㎡ 및 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 같은 도면 표시 24, 21, 26, 25, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉴ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 15㎡에서 퇴거하라.

5. The remainder of the plaintiff's claims against the Deputy Commissioner, the defendant's accommodation, and the defendant's abnormal crime are dismissed, respectively.

6. Of the costs of the lawsuit, the part arising between the plaintiffs and the Vice Minister of Justice shall be five minutes, and the remainder shall be borne by the plaintiffs, and the part arising between the plaintiffs and the defendant's house and the defendant's abnormal crime shall be borne by the plaintiffs. The part arising between the plaintiffs, the defendant's house and the defendant's abnormal crime shall be borne by the plaintiffs, and the part arising between the plaintiffs, the defendant's bar, and the defendant's Kim

7.Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 may be provisionally executed.

As to the defendant Lee Jong-hee and defendant Kim Sung-sung, the order is as follows, and as to the defendant Cho Jong-hee, defendant Cho Jong-hee, and defendant Lee Jong-sung, the judgment below is as follows.

1. The defendant assistant director;

A. As to the plaintiffs:

(1) the registration of transfer of ownership completed under No. 15011 on December 13, 1975 with respect to the buildings listed in Schedule 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon:

(2) the registration of initial ownership completed on February 28, 200 No. 11281 of the same Court with respect to the buildings listed in paragraph (1) of the same list;

execution of each procedure for cancellation registration;

(b)In the line that connects 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, 17, and 28 square meters for residential use and for residential use in the line that connects 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 5 points on the surface of the land listed in the attached Table 2 Schedule 1 to the Plaintiff in sequence, the 5 square meters for residential use and 45 square meters in the line that successively connects 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 6 each point on the surface of the land listed in the attached Table 2 Schedule 1 to the Plaintiff, the 5 square meters in the boiler room connected each point in sequence with each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, and 5 square meters in each line;

C. Each land listed in [Attachment 2] Nos. 1 and 2 shall be delivered to the plaintiffs;

라.원고들에게, 별지 2 목록 제1항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉮ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 28㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 5의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉯ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 45㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 6의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉰ 부분 보일러실 5㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 8, 9, 10, 11, 8의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉱ 부분 공동 욕실 5㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 18의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉲ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 27㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 24, 23, 22, 21, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉳ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 2㎡를, 별지 2 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 24, 21, 26, 25, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉴ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 15㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 21, 20, 27, 26, 21의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉵ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 7㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 42, 43, 48, 49, 42의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉶ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 17㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 43, 44, 47, 48, 43의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉷ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 24㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 44, 45, 46, 47, 44의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉸ 부분 창고 및 화장실 20㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 28의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉹ 부분 거주용 방 및 화장실 113㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 50의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉺ 부분 창고 16㎡를, 같은 도면 표시 58, 59, 60, 61, 58의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉻ 부분 창고 8㎡를 각 명도하라.

2. The defendant's accommodation is on the ground of the land stated in the attached Table 2 List 1 against the plaintiffs.

(a)in the line that connects each point in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, and 1 of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 17, and 28 square meters of a residential room and a kitchen

(b) within 5 square meters of joint bathing rooms in a line that connects each point of 8,9,10,11, and 8 of the same drawing indication;

Each evictiondra.

3. The defendant abnormal crime committed against the plaintiffs, on the ground of the land listed in the annexed Table 2 List 1

(a)on a room for residence in the line that connects each point in sequence of 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 5 attached Form Nos. 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 5;

(b)on the part of boiler room caused by a collision with each point of six points in sequence, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 6 of the same drawings;

(c) within 5 square meters of joint bathing rooms in a line that connects each point of 8,9,10,11, and 8 of the same drawing indication;

Each evictiondra.

Determination as to the legitimacy of the lawsuit against the Vice Minister of Justice of the Republic of Korea

The plaintiffs seek implementation of the procedure for registration of cancellation on the ground that the above building has been destroyed or lost, with respect to the registration of each transfer of ownership as stated in the claim for the registration of each transfer of ownership as to the building listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 and 3 of the separate sheet No. 1. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs seek implementation of the procedure for registration of cancellation on the ground that the registration of cancellation on the ground that the registration of preservation of ownership as stated in the claim for registration of cancellation on the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1

2. According to Articles 101-2(1), 101(2) and 101(4) of the Registration of Real Estate Act, the owner of a building site may file an application for the registration of destruction of a building in lieu of the right holder registered on the register of the building in lieu of the owner registered on the register of the building where the building was destroyed or lost. If a building site is registered on non-existent, the owner of the building site may file an application for the registration of destruction of the building in the above manner without the joint application or consent of the owner of the building. If the registration of destruction is completed pursuant to the above procedure, the registration of destruction and the registration of preservation of ownership recorded on the register will lose its effect. Thus, the Plaintiff, the owner of the building site of each building, who is the owner of the building site of the building, is still unable to file an application for the registration of destruction or non-existence of the building under Article 101(1) and (4) of the Registration of Real Estate Act against Defendant Vice-General, the title holder of the registration of the building.

Judgment on the merits

Basic Facts

The following facts are established without any dispute between the plaintiffs and the vice-chief of defendant, the principal house, and the abnormal crime, or between Gap evidence 2-1 through 10, Gap evidence 3-1 through 3, Gap evidence 4-1 through 4, Gap evidence 4-4, Gap evidence 6-1 through 4, Gap evidence 6-13, Gap evidence 6-1 through 26, Gap evidence 7-1 and 7-2, the testimony of Kim Young-young, the result of this court's on-site inspection and the result of the survey and appraisal by Kim Jong-won, and there is no other counter-proof, and it is deemed that the above defendants were led to confession pursuant to Article 139 (1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Act.

On March 24, 1994, on the land listed in paragraph (1) of the annexed Table 2 list No. 1, the defendant Cho Jong-soo indicated the annexed drawing No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, and 1, the part for residential use and the part for residential use and the part for residential use and the area of 28 square meters in the main line (hereinafter referred to as "the part for the instant case") connected each point of 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 5 square meters in sequence connected each point of 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 6 of the annexed drawing No. 2, the 5 square meters of the adjacent map No. 1,45 square meters (hereinafter referred to as "the section for the instant case") were newly indicated in the following order:

한편, 피고 조차장은 별지 2 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 43, 44, 47, 48, 43의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉷ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 24㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉷ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 도면 표시 44, 45, 46, 47, 44의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉸ 부분 창고 및 화장실 20㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉸ 부분 건물'이라 한다)를 피고 이승희에게 임대하였고, 1996. 2. 28. 같은 목록 제1항 기재 토지 지상의 같은 도면 표시 24, 23, 22, 21, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉳ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 2㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉳ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 같은 도면 표시 24, 21, 26, 25, 24의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉴ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 15㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉴ 부분 건물'이라 한다)를 피고 김성균에게 임대하여, 위 피고 이승희, 김성균은 각 임대건물을 점유하고 있다.

On March 12, 1996, the vice-chairperson of the defendant shall lease to the defendant's house the troupe part of the building of this case to the defendant's house, and on March 19, 197, the subordinate building of this case to the defendant's house, the subordinate building of the subordinate building of this case to the defendant's house, and the subordinate building of the subordinate building of this case to the defendant's house and the abnormal crime.

피고 조차장은 별지 2 목록 제1항 기재 토지 지상의 별지 도면 표시 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 18의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉲ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 27㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉲ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 같은 도면 표시 21, 20, 27, 26, 21의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉵ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 7㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉵ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 도면 표시 42, 43, 48, 49, 42의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉶ 부분 거주용 방 및 주방 17㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉶ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 도면 표시 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 28의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉹ 부분 거주용 방 및 화장실 113㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉹ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 도면 표시 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 50의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉺ 부분 창고 16㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉺ 부분 건물'이라 한다), 같은 도면 표시 58, 59, 60, 61, 58의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선 내 ㉻ 부분 창고 8㎡(이하 '이 사건 ㉻ 부분 건물이라 한다)를 각 점유하고 있다.

이 사건 ㉲ 내지 ㉻ 부분 각 건물은 별지 2 목록 제3항 기재 건물에 관한 일반 건축물 대장(갑 제3호증의 1) 및 등기부 등본(갑 제2호증의 3)에 등재되어 있다.

The plaintiffs received a successful bid on February 25, 200 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 attached hereto owned by Defendant Cho Jong-soo in the Daejeon District Court Decision 9Tcheon-do 11761, Daejeon District Court Decision 9YYY, and paid a successful bid on February 25, 200, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the receipt of No. 12139, Mar. 2, 200, but the buildings in this case and parts were excluded from the auction of the above real estate auction case.

Judgment on the claim against the Deputy Chief of Staff

별지 2 목록 제2항 기재 토지에 대한 인도 청구 및 이 사건 ㉲ 내지 ㉻ 부분 건물에 대한 명도청구에 관한 판단

위 인정 사실에 의하면, 별지 2 목록 제2항 기재 토지 및 이 사건 ㉲ 내지 ㉻ 부분 건물을 직접 또는 간접점유하는 피고 조차장은 위 각 부동산의 공동소유자인 원고들에게 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지를 인도하고 위 이 사건 ㉲ 내지 ㉻ 부분 건물을 각 명도할 의무가 있다.

Determination on the claim for delivery of the land specified in attached Table 2(1) and on the claim for removal and evacuation of the building under or the part of this case

The argument of the cause of claim

The plaintiffs, based on the above facts, are direct or indirect possessors of the land listed in Section 1 of the Attached Table 2 List, and Defendant Cho Jong-soo, the co-owner of the land listed in Section 1 of the same Table, who is the co-owner of the land listed in Section 1 of the same Table, asserts that the plaintiffs have a duty to deliver the land listed in Section 1 of the same Table to the plaintiffs, who are co-owner of the land listed in Section 1 of the same Table (the plaintiff's claim for the surrender of the building in this case or the section of the building in this case,

Judgment on the defense of the Intervenor by the Deputy Commissioner of Defendant 1

As to this, the supplementary intervenors of the defendant Cho Jong-soo asserted that he acquired legal superficies on the site of the building in the instant section or the instant section, so the supplementary intervenors of the defendant Cho Jong-tae owned all the land listed in the attached Table 2 List 1 and the building on the ground of the land and the instant section on the ground of the above, and the land listed in Paragraph 1 of the same Table on February 25, 200 were jointly awarded a successful bid by the plaintiffs as to the land listed in the land listed in the same Table No. 1 in the real estate rental auction case No. 11761 on February 25, 200, which became different owners. As so, the supplementary intervenors of the defendant Cho Jong-tae acquired legal superficies on the site of the instant building among the land listed in Paragraph 1 of the same Table as asserted by the supplementary intervenors of the defendant Cho Jong-soo, and therefore, the aforementioned defense by the supplementary intervenors of the defendant Cho Jong-soo is not established because the land owned by the same person and the building cannot be established as an auction or sale of the building without permission.

Sub-committee

Therefore, the defendant Cho-soo, who acquired legal superficies on the lower or lower part of the building site of this case, has a legitimate right to possess that part of the land. Therefore, the defendant Cho-soo is obligated to deliver only the remaining part of the land except the above building site among the land listed in attached Table 2 List 1 to the plaintiffs.

Determination as to the claim against the defendant's accommodation or abnormal crime

The argument of the cause of claim

The plaintiffs, based on the above facts of recognition, asserts that the defendant be aware of the defendant who occupies the scam part of the building of this case, and the defendant be aware of the fact that the defendant who occupies the walle part of the building of this case and the walp part of the building of this case, and the defendant's abnormal crime that occupies the walp part of the building of this case is obligated

Judgment on the defenses of the defendant bed and older than the defendant

As seen earlier, the defendant Cho Jong-soo, who leased each possession of the above buildings from the legal superficies holder. As seen earlier, the defendant Cho Jong-soo acquired legal superficies on the site of the instant YY or the lower part of the building, and the fact that the defendant Cho Jong-soo leased each of the instant spons or the part of the instant building from the defendant Cho Jong-soo was as recognized earlier. As such, it is reasonable to have a legitimate right to possess each of the above buildings to the defendant Cho Il-ju and the above sponse who leased each of the possession from the legal superficies holder. Therefore, the above defendants' defense is well-grounded.

Determination on the claim against Defendant Lee Jin-hee and Kim Sung-sung

위 인정 사실에 의하면, 이 사건 ㉷, ㉸ 부분 건물을 점유하는 피고 이승희와 이 사건 ㉳, ㉴ 부분 건물을 점유하는 피고 김성균은 별지 2 목록 제1, 2항 기재 토지의 공동소유자인 원고들에 대하여 각 점유건물에서 퇴거할 의무가 있다.

3. Conclusion

그렇다면 피고 조차장은 원고들에게 별지 2 목록 제1항 기재 토지 중 이 사건 ㉮ 내지 ㉱ 부분 토지를 제외한 나머지 토지 및 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지를 각 인도할 의무가 있고, 같은 목록 제 1, 2항 기재 토지 지상의 이 사건 ㉲ 내지 ㉻ 부분 건물을 각 명도할 의무가 있으며, 피고 이승희는 원고들에 대하여 같은 목록 제2항 기재 토지 지상의 이 사건 ㉷, ㉸ 부분 건물에서 퇴거할 의무가 있고, 피고 김성균은 원고들에 대하여 같은 목록 제1, 2항 기재 토지 지상의 이 사건 ㉳, ㉴ 부분 건물에서 퇴거할 의무가 있다. 그러므로 원고들의 이 사건 청구 중 피고 조차장에 대한 청구는 위 인정 범위 내에서 이유 있어 이를 각 인용하고, 피고 조차장에 대한 각 말소등기청구의 소는 부적법하여 이를 각 각하하며, 피고 조차장에 대한 나머지 청구는 이유 없어 이를 기각하기로 하고, 피고 이승희, 김성균에 대한 청구는 이유 있어 이를 각 인용하며, 피고 주유숙, 이상범에 대한 청구는 이유 없어 이를 각 기각하기로 하고, 소송비용은 주문 제6항에 기재한 바와 같이 원고들, 피고들의 각 부담으로 하며, 주문 제2, 3, 4항에 대하여 가집행선고를 붙여 주문과 같이 판결한다.

Article 24 of the Constitution