Of the facts charged of this case, each of the charges of this case shall be acquitted. As to the assault of each of the facts charged of this case.

Public Prosecutor's Office

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint confinement) around 21:00 on October 18, 2015, at the front of the Busan Dongdong-gu B, Busan, the Defendant found the victim C while searching together with D and E on the ground that the victim C escaped with the Defendant’s vehicle, and found the victim C from the vehicle, and went back from the vehicle, made the victim’s inside and outside of the victim C by drinking and hand. The above D prevented the victim F from escape by taking the victim’s arms together with the victim C, and then, the Defendant detained the victims for about 6 hours by forcing the victims to go back from the vehicle, and by allowing the victims to go through approximately 370 kilometers from the vehicle operated by the Defendant in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the Defendant’s HEFM or car at around 03:00 on the following day.

Accordingly, the defendant detained victims jointly with D and E.

2. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) at around 03:00 on October 19, 2015, on the ground that the Vice Minister of Justice, the Vice Minister of Justice, the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant under the above paragraph (1), the victim C, and the Victim F, make a false statement, making it possible for the Defendant to take the part of the victim C, the victim F, and the above D, and E to keep the victims from escape next to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with D and E, assaulted the victims as above.

The acquittal portion

1. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint confinement) committed several traffic accidents by cutting off the Defendant’s vehicle and causing the occurrence of a serious traffic accident after leaving the Defendant’s whereabouts. Accordingly, the Defendant found C to recover the said vehicle. D and E need to have the recovered vehicle as it is necessary for the driver to take the vehicle into account. As such, C’s error attached to Busan would be divided, and the Defendant would compensate for the damages by doing work at the third Deputy Commissioner.