Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months and by imprisonment for four months with prison labor for 2018 highest 698 crimes and by imprisonment for four months for 2018 highest 99

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2016, the defendant of "2018 High 698" was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Jeonju District Court on September 3, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 3, 2016.

On February 6, 2016, the Defendant is not able and able to work for the Victim F, E, the owner of E, even if he/she received the advance payment from the injured party, and the Defendant is on board for one year from the Gu administration of 2016,00 won.

Around the 14th day of the same month, “The daily life cost of KRW 1 million is changed to the prepaid gold prior to the disposal of the E”, and the false end of the same month.

The Defendant, on February 6, 2016, shall be liable for the payment of 12 million won to the injured party on two occasions at the same place on February 6, 2016 and the same month.

7. The amount of eight million won and the amount of one million won on the 14th of the same month was remitted to the accounts of the Saemaul Treasury in the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 21 million from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

around February 10, 2017, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim I (J, Benz E300) registered in the name of the recipient of the passenger car (J, E300) registered in the name of the recipient.

Along with the loan of money to repay the money, a false statement was made to the effect that a person would repay the money borrowed to the victim within one week with the proceeds sold by finding the said vehicle and selling it.

However, in fact, the Defendant decided to purchase the said car from K and did not acquire ownership due to the failure to pay the price, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged person, it was thought that it would be used for other personal purposes, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim within one week with the price for sale.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is next to the victim.