A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2015, at around 01:15, the Defendant visited the E box located in Hannam Hannam-gun, Hannam-gun, which is a taxi engineer, to return home to the Defendant, and the police officer affiliated with the Hanan Police Station E box was recommended by F to return home to the Defendant. The Defendant expressed his own desire to “Ssty styp, styp, schep.,” and even if she returned from F, she did not take a bath.

In order to hear the word of "", he/she committed violence, such as leaving his/her cell phone in the wall of a police box, leaving the sponsor, leaving the F's cell phone with his/her hand floor once, and obstructing the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the statement protocol to F prepared by the police;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no same record, the fact that there is no same record, the fact that there is no ground for the suspended sentence does not constitute a ground for disqualification of the suspended sentence, and the crime that obstructs the performance of official duties will not

dismissed part of the prosecution.

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant left a taxi on July 18, 2015, at around 00:5, the same time as he gets in a taxi operated by the victim C and takes a bath to the victim without any particular reason while drunking the taxi at the seat of the Dong Center located in the G apartment building located in the G apartment building, the purpose of which is at around 01:11 on the same day, and the Defendant left the taxi at the front of the H Mart, and the Defendant 10,000 won was paid at the taxi expense. As such, the Defendant’s land manager changed KRW 10,000,000 and 100,000 won was fright to death.

The bitbitch shall be equal.

v. D. D. D.) The term “n.e.,” could be expressed in a number of times, as the victim would have been faced.