logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.05.24 2017고단343
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 6, 2016, around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) heard the victim E (18 years old)’s desire to talk with telephone call; and (b) misunderstanding the victim’s desire to talk to the Defendant; and (c) misunderstanding the victim’s desire to talk.

“In accordance with the two descendants, the victim was forced to be treated for approximately one week, and the victim was in need of approximately one-time medical treatment.”

2. On December 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was asked by the police officer I to ask him questions to confirm facts at the front of the G convenience store located in the Republic of Korea, Haguk-gun, Haguk-gun, Hagu-gun on the same ground as that described in paragraph 1, and called out after receiving a 112 report for the same reason; and (b) the Defendant was asked by the police officer I to the police officer I to whom he belongs of the Hagu-gun Police Station, who was called out.

Hahn Ma Mahn Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

“Absently, the lower police officer’s chest part of the said police officer’s chest was pushed down once by her hand, and the lower police officer’s neck was cut by her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to I,K, E, L, M, or N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and other conditions of the sentencing indicated in the record.

The unfavorable circumstances: The circumstances that the defendant led to the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution are the confession of the defendant and the depth of the defendant, and the extent of the injury.

arrow