logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.08.30 2013고단2248
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around April 20, 1994, which is an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged, a violation of vehicle operation restriction on the roads front of the annexed business office of the Korea Highway Corporation. 2. Punishment provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 201, 201, 201Hun-Ga38, 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, a defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow