본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.01.17 2013재고정2
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A around July 29, 2003, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, a violation of vehicle operation restriction on the roads prior to the Ulsan Metropolitan Office. 2. Punishment provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 29, 201, 201, 201Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, 2008Hun-Ga17, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.