The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflects his/her own mistake, and there is no record of criminal punishment.

On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case is disadvantageous to the fact that the defendant was issued a false identification card with a synthetic photograph and requested a vicarious examination twice by using it, and that the defendant applied for the specialized law school of law using the ETPS sexual acquired through the vicarious examination. Nevertheless, it is very significant in light of the relevant law, etc., the fact that the investigation agency and the court below have consistently accepted his mistake from the investigation agency to the court below, and was leveled to avoid his responsibility.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.