1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A is entitled to:

The state of port H is the wife of the network, the rest of the plaintiffs are the children of the network H, and F, the defendant foundation, is the foundation that operates the I Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Hospital"), and the defendant G is the head of the defendant hospital.

B. On June 1, 2011, the deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”) was diagnosed with alcohol liver and urology, and was administered on a regular basis after undergoing a regular examination. On June 1, 201, the deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s emotional surgery under a semi-annual condition that he was faced with the bones at the Green Eastern Hospital, following the bicycle going beyond the upper right upper part of the bicycle.

C. The result of the surgery conducted on June 1, 201, the deceased was due to blood spugpug spug spug b conditions, and there was a risk of decline in the liver function due to the surgery, and the function of spug spug spug b conditions was reduced by 63% of the anticipated value due to chronic pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary function was somewhat lowered due to the foregoing

[BN 31.2 (Abnormal 7-18), Creinine 1.71 (Abnormal 0.6-1.2)] D.

On June 1, 201, and June 2, 201, K, the static and the chief of the Defendant Hospital, entrusted the heart department, fire extinguishers department, respiratory department, and blood-type internal department, and prescribed a prescription to cover 12 units in the blood plate and 2 units in the pulmonary surgery before the operation from the internal department of the fire extinguisher, and prescribed a prescription to cover 12 units in the blood plate and 2 units in the pulmonary surgery before the operation, from the pulmonary department, one time in the pulmonary department, and from the blood-type department, there is a risk that the pulmonary fluor and the pulmonary fluor value in the blood-type department may reduce the pulmonary fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor value.

E. On June 6, 2011, the Defendant Hospital received written consent from the Plaintiff on the surgery from the Plaintiff, but decided to conduct the surgery after receiving the written consent from the Deceased’s children, and decided to conduct the surgery from June 7, 201 to the Deceased in preparation for alcohol.