1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the H’s wife. The rest of the Plaintiffs are H’s children, and F, the Defendant Incorporated Foundation, is an incorporated foundation that operates an I Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant G is the head of the Defendant Hospital.

B. H (J) was diagnosed with alcohol livering and urology, and was administered regularly, and was under a regular examination. On June 1, 201, H (J) was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital’s regular surgery when he was satisfying the bones of the upper right, and was satisfying the bones at the Green Eastern Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital’s regular surgery.

C. As a result of an operation conducted on June 1, 201, the results of the operation conducted on 45km, H had a risk of undermining the liver function due to blood disorder, blood sugh pug screB due to livering the body’s 45km, and there was a risk of undermining the liver function due to the surgery. The pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary function was reduced to 63% of the expected pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary function was reduced

[BN 31.2 (Abnormal 7-18), Creinine 1.71 (Abnormal 0.6-1.2)] D.

On June 1, 201, and June 2, 201, K, the static and the chief of the Defendant Hospital, entrusted the heart department, fire extinguishers department, respiratory department, and blood satisfying department, and prescribed a prescription to cover 12 units in the blood plate and 2 units in the blood satisfy, before the operation from the respiratory department, before the operation, and to make a prescription to cover 12 units in the blood plate and 2 units in the blood satisfying department, from the respiratory department, one time in the blood satfry part, and there is a risk that the satisfymine and the blood satch value will decrease in the blood satfy part.

E. Around 21:00 on June 6, 201, Defendant Hospital received a written consent from the Plaintiff, but decided to conduct the surgery after receiving the written consent from H’s children, and decided to conduct the surgery, first of all, from 00:0 on June 7, 2011 to H in preparation for hydrogen alcohol.

F. K = 13:00 on June 7, 201 to H’s children.