logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2021.02.05 2020고단2357
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The public offering and role sharing B of Defendant, B, etc. is called “C” and play a key role in the so-called “total liability for loans” in the office of the 6th E-dong branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government DD D D D D building in order to manage the so-called work loans, such as counseling by the clients, loan design, loan management, and distribution of profits. The F, upon receiving instructions from B related to a one-time work loan, sent instructions from the 2 team G, 3 team president, etc. to manage the organization, while performing the role of managing the organization, in order to improve the credit rating in relation to the work loan, such as payment of insurance premiums, taxes in arrears, unpaid credit card payments, etc., with the client of the loan or corporate credit card, the applicant for the loan, or the person who performs the key role in B’s establishment and operation in the lending organization with the total book at the 2 team leader of the lending organization, and the person who takes charge of the management and operation of the loan and consultation from the bank.

The Defendant had been unable to obtain a loan from a financial institution in a normal way due to the situation in which the Defendant could not work from around March 2018 when the delivery day of the restaurant in China for ten years.

Accordingly, on March 2018, the Defendant came to know of K's introduction on the date of the non-standing date of March 2018 and conspired to collect loans from the Defendant as the borrower's name after doing work to make the appearance as if the Defendant had income.

2. The Defendant, B, F, and I, according to the contents of the vehicle sale financing fraud, did not have worked as the head of the above company's business, even though the Defendant did not work for L.

arrow