Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Criminal facts

[2017 Highest 401]

1. On March 2017, Defendant A’s injured Defendant leased the core chips of mobile phones opened under the name of Defendant Defendant to Nonparty E (the remaining and 19 years of age) through D. After that, the injured party was aware of the fact that the injured party arbitrarily settled a small amount of money equivalent to KRW 200,000 without the Defendant’s consent and caused the Defendant to pay the amount to the Defendant, the injured party was able to ask the victim for a delivery.

Therefore, the Defendant, at around 00:00 on March 12, 2017, went on the back of the F driver's car where the Defendant was working on the back of the F driver's car, where the Defendant was working on the part of the Defendant, who was in contact with the Defendant from the new mother located in the Mara-dong of Busan, Seodong-gu, Busan, and on the back of the F driver's car.

“In response, the victim’s face face was 4 to 5 times.”

The defendant continued to move the victim to a parking lot near the mountain traffic company located in the same Dong in order to attract the victim to a rare place in the human body and move the victim to a parking lot near the mountain traffic company in the same Dong, one of the parking lot, and the victim's face and body part were sent up to the number of the victim's face and body.

In the end, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the cutting of a pelto, which requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment.

[2017 Highest 953]

2. Defendant A’s special injury on January 30, 2017: (a) the victim I (the remaining and the age of 25) who was assaulted by Defendant A at H’s main point located in Busan Seo-gu G on January 30, 2017 by the victim I (the age of 25) who was assaulted by Defendant B at the H main point located in Busan Seo-gu G, Busan, and that the Defendant did not discover and report

In the course of demanding the return from the injured party one-time price for the part of the return, the plaintiff saw the beer residues, which was a dangerous object on the table, to the injured party, and the above beer residues was suitable for the head of the injured party.

After all, the defendant carried dangerous articles and carried the head's injury to the victim who could not know the number of days of treatment.

3. Defendant B’s joint assault is the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (2) with J.