The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around May 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) filed a complaint with the public service center of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Dong-dong Incheon Metropolitan City Police Station; (b) “E is one million won per annum on April 15, 2003; (c) the issuer, A, a promissory note 1, an issuer, a promissory note 1, an issuer, and a promissory note 1, an issuer, a KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won per annum on September 8, 2006; and (d) on October 4, 2007, a promissory note 3, an issuer, a promissory note 20% per annum.”

However, the Defendant was aware from the beginning that E did not forge the above three promissory notes and the payment note written on the basis of the three promissory notes, as the Defendant signed and sealed the above three copies directly.

In this respect, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

2. The key issue of the instant case is whether or not the Defendant has affixed his name and seal on the part of Chapter Three of the Promissory Notes, and as to this, E extended KRW 145 million (i.e., the total amount of KRW 15 million on April 15, 2003, KRW 15 million on September 8, 2006, KRW 110 million on September 10, 2007, KRW 20 million on September 10, 2007, KRW 185 million on September 11, 2007, KRW 5 million on which the next day attached to the Defendant, thereby making an additional loan to E to pay the total principal of the loan amount of KRW 185 million on September 11, 2007, KRW 15 million on the loan amount of KRW 10,55 million on September 4, 207. Therefore, the Defendant made an annual payment to E with the purport that “the loan amount of KRW 185 million on October 4, 20007.”.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the records, are all at the same time: (i) three bills of this case shall be delivered at the same time: