beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. According to Gap's evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff July 20, 2016 the face value of 50,000 won, ① the issue date July 20, 2016, ② the issuance date of promissory note 50,000 won, ② the issuance date of 50,000 won, ② the issue date of August 20, 2016, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the payee, the issuer, and the issuer, ② the issuer, and the issuer, ④ the issuer, the issuer, the issuer, and the issuer, ④ the issuer, the issuer, the promissory note 1, the issuer, the issuer, the defendant, and the issuer's promissory note 1,50,00 won, three hundred, five hundred, five,00,00 won, the issuance date of the promissory note 10,016, and the Plaintiff, the issuer, the issuer, and the issuer, the issuer, and the issuer, the issuer, and the issuer.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The defendant borrowed KRW 1,500,000 from the plaintiff and issued three promissory notes with face value of KRW 500,000, which are the face value of KRW 500,000, and thereafter, the plaintiff demanded that one promissory note with face value of KRW 1,50,000 be re-issued in lieu of three promissory notes with face value of KRW 500,000, and that one promissory note with face value of KRW 1,50,000 should be re-issued. The defendant asserted that it is improper to claim the defendant to pay KRW 3,00,000 to the defendant as the plaintiff was separately issued with promissory notes under the above Chapter 4, but since there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.
B. The Defendant alleged to the effect that the Defendant repaid KRW 500,00 to the Plaintiff on September 20, 2016. However, the Defendant’s assertion is insufficient to acknowledge the Defendant’s above assertion with only the statement in subparagraph 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.
3. If so, the defendant shall be the plaintiff.